*yawn* Haven't this discussion be going on for too long now?
There are several netiquett sites out there. There are probably some really interesting netiquett mailinglists for you all to flame instead of this one... This is the last line in this thread for me, so don't bother to reply to it, cause its a really booring thread... /Bjorn On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Ian mu wrote: > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > It has to be done correctly for the reasons mentioned. Main thing is a > simple polite "can you next time please start with a fresh mail and not > reply to one and change the topic for archiving reason" should suffice > really. > > On 11/28/05, Andrew Forsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dagok wrote: > > > > > Obviously he didnt know when he did it, nor did I until it was pointed > > > out > > > in this thread. So how is that knowingly? > > > > My cl_care cvar for this subject is rapidly approaching 0, however -- > > your and Glenn's point of view appears to be that we should be using > > Outlook. This implies that it is everyone else's problem that elementary > > list etiquette isn't required. > > > > I say 'knowingly', since you're also complaining about Eric 'bitching' > > about this sort of thing. Ben K in particular has posted on the same > > subject many times recently. > > > > It's not such a difficult concept to grasp. But whatever... back to work. > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
