We should convince some programmers with (re-)writing a "real" anticheat. We need a mixture of CD, HLGuard and SSClient/Server...
The people around HLGuard may add an additional client to HLGuard as an option, which is able to scan the processes on clients... I would spend a public server for experimental workouts ;) I would spend some webspace for a forum or something else... (but I will never have the money for paying a programmer, but Valve has, and they do nearly nothing) hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com schrieb am 17.02.06 10:15:25: > > > On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, grammaton782 wrote: > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > hi folks > > > > first of all, this mailing list is NOT the place 2 post about vac2, > > except matters of not runing or starting (bugs) vac2 or beta developing > > under dedicated linux servers, not for starting a diskussion about > > efficiency of this ac tool > > Why is this not a good place to discuss VAC2? I think its as good as > anywhere else. At least it is HL related. And isnt this list for > administrators running a HL server and isnt VAC a part of it? > > In my book this list should be able to hold any discussion that are > related to running a server. And it should be a place where administrators > can meet and have a discussion. > > /Bjorn > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
