[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
Tried disabling hyperthreading?
//JT
Scott Long wrote:

I do agree with you on the server side FPS problems. I have the same
problems that you do with server side FPS dropping into the low teens. As
all of you noticed from the TOP I posted previously, I am not having CPU or
RAM problems.

The main issue with the FPS drop on the server is that is affects the
clients and game play is noticeably worse. This normally happens at the
start of a round. I have tried the following to resolve the FPS issue:

1. Remove all plugins and reinstall SRCDS
2. Drop the server player count from 32 to 26 and then to 20

It seems as though no matter what happens, if you have a semi-busy server no
matter what the player count is, I am seeing the FPS issue when the server
reaches about 70% capacity on one SRCDS instance. I killed my second SRCDS
instance and tried running ONE server on a quad proc xeon box with 2 gigs of
ram and I still experienced the FPS drops.








-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcel
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Worse performance since last update

Hi,

First: I'm talking about srcds_l

We are also registering problems.
The CPU usage grows up to 100% for some seconds, about 10fps on the
server and after that time everything continues normally.

Before the last update there were no problem.

Server details:
Fedora Core 1
Kernel 2.6.15 (700hz)
P4 2,8GHz
1 GB RAM

Srcds details:
Tickrate 50 or 66 (no difference)
With or without Mani (no difference)

- Marcel


JCHost.net - Support schrieb:


Regarding performance, is anyone else getting terrible memory leaks?  They
seem to effect my intel systems more so that the AMD, but if I leave them
running for more than 3 or 4 days almost all my ram is gone.  After that a
simple restart will free up 300-500 meg of ram or more sometimes.

jc

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aXeR


(AmmoBOX)


Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Worse performance since last update

Issue cat /proc/sys/kernel/HZ over SSH

----- Original Message -----
From: "JCHost.net - Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[7]
To: <hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com>[8]
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 5:54 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Worse performance since last update




Well actually I'm wrong I found out we didn't' even compile a custom
kernel
on this server.  So I have no idea what speed its running at.

:(

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of aXeR
(AmmoBOX)
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Worse performance since last update

JC,

What freq. is your kernel at?

Regards,

----- Original Message -----
From: "JCHost.net - Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[12]
To: <hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com>[13]
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 4:51 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Worse performance since last update




I've had some performance issues lately as well.  I have a Dual Dual


core


opteron using less than 10% of cpu and my clients are complaining that
the
server will not maintain tickrate(fps).  I have tried various settings
and
configs and I don't even know for sure if it's the server side that is
giving the lower fps.  Some of my clients think that I need to compile a
better kernel on my linux servers?  Could this be true?

JC

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Worse performance since last update

Greetings

Well, since I updated my 32 Slot Server from Engine Version 29 to 35,
the CPU usage is 20-30% higher, so that I had to reduce my the Slotcount
to 20, to prevent lag and monsterpings.
Unfortunaly I forgot to make an backup before updating, so it would be
very nice if someone could tell me, where I can get older HLDS Updates.

cheers
SecurityFox

aXeR (AmmoBOX) wrote:



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hi Guys,

Since the none compulsory update in March where some changes were made


to


apparently decrease CPU usage we've been noticing degradation in server
performance.


However unlike a lot of complaints on the mailing list / forums we
haven't


really noticed our average CPU usage go up much - a couple of spikes


here


and there but certainly none of this 'maxing out my server' business


that


some people are encountering.


The performance drop after the non-compulsory update in March ended up


in


us rolling back the update because bullet registry and warping was


really


poor.  After rolling back the update everything (bar the in-game VAC
secure
icon on connecting to servers) was perfect again.  However after the
compulsory update the other day we're having the same problem again
(although it doesn't seem quite as bad) that's over a month since when
the
issue was first reported, I really hoped that would have been sufficient
time for Valve to fix it but this doesn't seem to be the case.


>From a good browse on the forums there has been plenty of discussion


about


this matter and quite a few people are in a position where they are
having
to jump ship to Windows which is a real shame.  What concerns me the


most


though is that there is very little discussion about it on the mailing
list.
What does this mean, that people are noticing the issue or that they
don't
care?  My point is that issues like these are not going to get fixed
unless
enough people start making a fuss (and I don't mean fuss as in "OMFG I
HATE
YOU VALVE!!!111" - etc)


I would be really interested to know how many others have picked up on


these anomalies, especially on higher tickrate servers since the last
compulsory / non-compulsory update.


Cheers,
-----
Jon Roberts
Technical Director
AmmoBOX Networks (Ltd)
Web: www.ammobox.net[18]
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,


please visit:


http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[20]







_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[21]


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[22]



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[23]


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[24]



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[25]


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,


please visit:


http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[26]





_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[27]



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux[28]




===References:===
  1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  3. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
  4. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  5. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  6. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
  7. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  8. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
  9. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 10. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 11. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
 12. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 13. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
 14. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 15. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 16. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 17. mailto:hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
 18. http://www.ammobox.net
 19. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 20. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 21. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 22. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 23. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 24. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 25. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 26. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 27. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 28. http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to