Three emails is a bit ridiculous, don't you think? Send your entire
question in one email please!
---
Regime
Thomas Ackermann wrote:
> Now the questions:
>
> How to configure a client, a player, correctly?
>
> rate could be 20000 without a problem - fits for all cases and servers.
> cl_rate could still be at 9999, no real problem here ...
>
> cl_updaterate can not be higher as 40 (limited by sv_maxupdaterate) and
> should probably not lower. Maybe just 100 to be right for
> War/LAN-Servers? Or does a higher cl_updaterate produces problems of any
> kind if higher than the servers sv_maxupdaterate?
>
>
> cl_cmdrate should be higher as cl_updaterate, yes?
>
> So, if we doubled cl_updaterate from 20 to 40, should be double
> cl_cmdrate from 30 to 60?
>
> Is that "more correct", "more exact" then cl_cmdrate of 40 or 50?
>
> What would be the technical effects of cl_cmdrate higher then that?
> 70,80, 90, 100, 150, 200?
>
> It seems, as soon as we get higher than sys_ticrate, there could be
> problems with the synchronisation ... but is that true? Would it not
> still better to send the command ("shot") to the server as fast as
> possible?
>
> So, why not increase cl_cmdrate to very high levels? 200, 500, 1000
> You could increase cl_rate up to 20000 to help with this ...
>
> The question remains, if the server can make use of such high rate of
> commands from a client ...
> Or does he just drop commnds after some queue ist filled, dropping
> shots btw.
> So, what is the best value for cl_cmdrate technically - based on the
> servers setting and the other settings of a client?
>
> It seems, cl_cmdrate should be somewhere between cl_updaterate and
> sys_ticrate - or to be more exact, up to the real FPS of the server.
> Should it be higher or less then the actual FPS of the server?
>
> With our example server, doubling cl_updaterate from 20 to 40 to match
> the server´s sv_maxupdaterate, we could also double cl_cmdrate from 30
> to 60.
> Should we go higher than that?
>
> What about a server with sv_maxupdaterate 100?
> We should use cl_updaterate 100 then - but which cl_cmdrate? 100 as
> well? Or 150 (5 times 30, as 100 is 5 times 20)
>
> Strange questions?
>
> I just cannot find technical information about this ...
>
> My questions expand to ex_interp in the next mail.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
