Ian mu wrote:
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] On the coke test of being able to tell the difference (haven't tested on a lan, but guessing not referring to that), anyone we've tested to see if they can tell the difference have never been able to (decent players, with a few not even being able to tell the difference with 33, but enough to suggest that there is).
Same here, tested a "pro" CS 1.6 clan who where insisting they couldn't play unless they had a server with 1000 FPS. They couldn't tell the difference above 200 and I suspect they only figured that because the ping was lower. Was quite amusing then I took away rcon access: Pros: "But how are we meant to tell if its better or not?" Me: "By playing on it!" Pros: "But we cant tell if its 1000 FPS without rcon." Me: "Exactly, you clearly dont needed it then do you!" A smooth server where the game play "fps" stays solid will play better than a "tweaked" server which cant maintain its output any day of the week. Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
