Totally. If you're writing server plugins, Linux is the way to go. Linux
performance has gotten better, but still hasn't come to par with Windows.
Or so is the case with SRCDS, I haven't run goldsrc in a 'official'
capacity for a couple years now.

Thanks,
Kyle.

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Steven Sumichrast <packh...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I think the general opinion has been that goldsource and source have
> slightly better performance on Windows.  That being said, I'm getting
> significant return on my "free" investment in Debian boxes.
>
> Gentoo is nice, but to me all the work in customizing the kernel and
> reading/learning about the kernel... It's good to do when you want to
> learn about Linux, but I want my box to run without issue all the
> time, and Gentoo just requires you to know "too much" about what
> you're doing, IMO.  I'd rather just stand the kernel up and move on.
> The little extra performance I'm going to squeeze out with Gentoo
> isn't worth my time (especially since game servers just cost me money
> to run!)
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Collin Howard <my_azz...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for the replies guys, i have been using centos 5.x for past 2
> years but getting tired of segmentation faults. I have used gentoo before
> on a box and have a small amount of experience with it. Im thinking about
> officially moving to gentoo. Also whats your opinions on using windows if
> you are specifically running gldsrc games such as cs1.6? From what I have
> heard its better optimized for windows and therefore gives better
> performance?
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Ook <ooksser...@zootal.com>
> > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list <
> hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 3:45:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OS
> >
> > Slackware 13.37 64 bit with the 3.3.7 kernel. Rock solid. Gets the job
> done. Not really for the linux newbies, as it doesn't do much hand-holding.
> Slackware is a basic distro without a lot of gui bells and whistles. I used
> to use Windows 2000, but got tired of the regular BSODs everytime I passed
> gas or a flock of cosmic rays blew by. Replaced Win2000 with linux, hasn't
> gone down once. Even the X server is surprisingly stable, the current
> version of xfce is lean and bloat free and more important, very stable.
> >
> > I run xfce because I use bpftp for my ftp server, and it is a windows
> program. Works great via wine. Everything else I've converted from their
> Windows equivalents to native linux apps. 3GB on the box, two OP4 servers,
> one minecraft server, one ftp server via wine, apache, noip, and it's
> currently using 1.5GB and 5% cpu (older Phenom four core cpu, one of the
> slower ones).
> >
> >
> >
> > On 07/08/2012 07:12 PM, Collin Howard wrote:
> >> Is Gentoo a good distro for goldsrc HLDS? What distro's do you server
> ops use and recommend? I'm not looking for a OS battle here. Just a simple
> answer with a small explanation why. :)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to