I had to recompile GCC and GLIBC a few times because I kept running into
the SSP bug with a static compile (referenced, below). Since I wasn't sure
where the error was coming from, I tried different orders of toolchain
builds until I got a combination that worked.
I'll try your suggestion to recompile glibc without the fstack-protector
patch.
Sean
> This bug is caused by the prototypes in
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/stack_protector.c. Comment out:
> void __guard_setup(void) __attribute__ ((constructor));
> void __stack_smash_handler(char func[], int damaged __attribute__
((unused)));
> and everything is fine after. I'll send a new patch.
Robert Connolly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Hardened LFS
Development List <[email protected]>
rg> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Linking
precompiled binaries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
scratch.org
05/24/2005 04:38 PM
Please respond to Hardened
LFS Development List
On May 20, 2005 02:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I suspect the simple solution is to build a non-SSP version of the
> libraries but before I did...
>
> I am experimenting with the use of precompiled binaries (Oracle) on a
HLFS
> server and I am running into the following when I try to relink the
> precompiled binaries:
>
> /lib/libcrypt.so.1: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /lib/libcrypt.so.1: undefined reference to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This looks to me like you reinstalled libc.so.6 from someone else, is that
right?
> Do I have any other options (like recompiling glibc with backward
> compatibiliy)?
If you reinstall glibc without the fstack-protector patch, but with the ssp
patch, the above error should go away.
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
