I made those chances too... works find. hLfs/blfs compiles find ( no X). michael
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Robert Connolly Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2005 23:20 An: [email protected] Betreff: Changes from gcc-3.4.3 to gcc-3.4.4 Hello. One piece of the ssp patch doesn't patch on to gcc-3.4.4.. in gcc-3.4.3 we have this: @@ -1449,7 +1464,9 @@ } if (new == 0) - new = assign_stack_local_1 (decl_mode, GET_MODE_SIZE (decl_mode), 0, func); + new = function ? + assign_stack_local_1 (decl_mode, GET_MODE_SIZE (decl_mode), 0, func) + : assign_stack_local_for_pseudo_reg (decl_mode, GET_MODE_SIZE (decl_mode), 0); PUT_CODE (reg, MEM); PUT_MODE (reg, decl_mode); In the patch for gcc-3.4.4 I used this: @@ -1457,8 +1472,11 @@ } if (new == 0) - new = assign_stack_local_1 (decl_mode, GET_MODE_SIZE (decl_mode), - consecutive_p ? -2 : 0, func); + new = function ? + assign_stack_local_1 (decl_mode, GET_MODE_SIZE (decl_mode), + consecutive_p ? -2 : 0, func) + : assign_stack_local_for_pseudo_reg (decl_mode, GET_MODE_SIZE (decl_mode), + consecutive_p ? -2 : 0); PUT_CODE (reg, MEM); PUT_MODE (reg, decl_mode); As you can see gcc-3.4.4's version has extra variables or arguments in assign_stack_local_1. I think my modification is reasonable.. The gcc-3.4.4-ssp-1.patch I made passes the testsuites, and otherwise works fine as far as I can see. robert -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
