Kevin Day wrote:
However, I have a huge problem with what has been said in the last few posts.
(under uClibc only)
Heres the problem: It seems that uClibc does not yet fully support iso8859-1
or any other types. Instead I have noticed that iso8859-1 is simply more of a
symbolic link to UTF8.
I noticed this when I tried to run SAMBA on my system, using an smb.conf file I
have already used. In there, I have the codec set to ISO8859-1.
Samba spits out hell, when I changed it to UTF8, samba had no problem. I
further noticed UTF8 in other places where I thought I had force iso8859-1.
Try different spelling, "ISO-8859-1". But I doubt this will help.
Perhaps I missed something? HLFS does not focus on UTF8 in any way, but uClibc
seems to only fully supply UTF8, unless I screwed up in style..
If you can prove me wrong and show me how to NOT get UTF8, I'd be glad as it
was not my goal. I'm fine with iso8859-1.
uClibc really supports only ASCII. No UTF-8. Either live with this, or
don't use it.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
