I don't know I'm losing my mind, or if I entered the twilight zone. This is a draft I wrote but never sent.
Also, have any of you ever seen this before: $ uptime 16:00:28 up 13 days, 20:51, 0 users, load average: 0.05, 0.10, 0.08 ... "0 users". robert On July 3, 2006 09:43 pm, Robert Connolly wrote: > Oops, sent send without realizing it. > > On July 3, 2006 09:41 pm, Robert Connolly wrote: > > I have attached experimental differences to build HLFS with gcc-4.1.1 and > > uclibc-20060613. Comments are welcome. > > > > gcc-4.1.1 has a demented check for "__stack_chk_fail in target GNU C > > library". Setting gcc_cv_libc_provides_ssp=yes is pretty much the only > > way to use uClibc's ssp with gcc-4.1.1; and it doesn't hurt with Glibc > > either, especially when installing to /tools. > > > > I like the idea of tossing in a 'make bootstrap' somewhere, either in > > chapter 5 or 6. Many host systems may be using gcc-3.2 or gcc-3.3, and a > > proper bootstrap would help assure the gcc-4.1.1 compiler is compiled > > correctly. Doing this in chapter 5 is more traditional, but in chapter 6 > > a profiledbootstrap is more convenient. > > > > Also, I noticed binutils-2.16.93 (and binutils-2.17.50.0.2) are more > > sensitive to CFLAGS than before. > > > > ---- > > > > robert -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
