On 9/5/06, Dermot Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been looking into segfault/memory leak problems and having been
> thinking it was uClibc:
> http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2006-August/016100.html
> Which means that some did exist and are fixed. So trying versions
> after that may be safer. The 20060817 snapshot was released sometime
> after that post, and uClibc is currently boasting the 20060819
> snapshot, so it should not contain the memory leak.
That email list posting seems to be about a bug in uClibc++, not uClibc.
Thanks for catching that, I must have overlooked the ++.
--
Kevin Day
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
