I have already developed a pretty stable HLFS (ie. I have not found a bug yet...).

Have a look at http://www.secure-slinux.org.

Basically it is based on HLFS SVN-20060717 with kernel updated to 2.6.17.8 and grsecurity
updated to 2.1.9-2.6.17.8.

There are a few bugs fixed in the book. It would be a matter of a few hours to list them here in
the mailing list.

It has a lot of features added and lots of packages from BLFS run on it with no problem at all, including XOrg, XFCE, Firefox, postfix, fcron, etc. Of course for a base HLFS we don't need
those packages.

A slightly older version (however with little change) has been running for over half a year on
a production server. No problems either.

If there is any interest, I could post those changes!

Sebastian Faulborn




Betreff:
Re: Status of HLFS project
Von:
Robert Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum:
Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:25:24 -0400
An:
Hardened LFS Development List <[email protected]>


Great :-) I can't wait to see.

robert

On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:37, Robert Baker wrote:
        Well I have about the same schedule as you Robert, but I am willing to
throw my hat in the ring to help maintain HLFS-Stable. I have a big
interest in seeing that we can work out a hardened system capable of being
used for stable server environments. I think that starting another branch
for Stable is exactly what needs to happen. I am more than willing to sink
a good 10-20 hrs a week into maintaining, and I have allready begun working
on a branch of the SVN-20060717 build of HLFS. I am taking your suggestions
at face value, and making the required adaptations to work from a more
stable package set. I will have my edited HLFS-Book ready for review
sometime this weekend time permitting.

Hopefully we can get the ball rolling here, and I would love to help out
with what time I have to do so.

Robert Baker


--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to