http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f1a60dbf68061e5a5364cbc723786b355637ffd3
in addition to numerous problems the hlfs project (as well as my own rigs) has faced, whenever the HLFS dev picks back up, gcc-4.1 should be avoided. But at the rate things are going gcc-4.2 should be out by the time hlfs-dev picks back up (as opposed to hlfs-stable) to make things all better. Which reminds me, will there be a future split in the HLFS mailings lists when dev picks back up? Maintaining both stable and dev on one mailings "might" cause trouble. HLFS is quite small in popularity when compared to the parent projects (LFS/BLFS), so mainting both hlfs-stable and hlfs-dev on the same mailing list may be doable. -- Kevin Day -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
