Robert Connolly wrote: > Instead of porting shadow-utils to openssl, I think > it would be more sensible to port openssl to shadow-utils, and start sortof > from scratch.
Well, I always thought shadow is bloated, but rewriting the whole thing? If we stick to GNU/Linux and forget about everything else, just concentrate on what HLFS/BLFS needs... yes, sounds doable. And as I look on the installed executables of shadow; what are those like newgrp and others having letter 'g' in them for? I've never even heard of them being used... -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
