Robert Connolly wrote: > Do any of you know assembly well enough to convert this: > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~robert/new/dd.asm > to something gcc can compile? And remove all the options, making bs=1 the > default, and 'dd from-file to-file' the only thing it does. Oh man. Do we *really* need asm? I don't think so. If you consider libc unsecure, just forget about secure system. Make it simplest read/write C with hardcoded paths. That's tough enough for anyone to crack.
Or even better, just leave sysklogd running under root and chroot it only. What do we have GRSecurity chroot limits for then ensuring root won't escape from jail? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
