On 6/7/07, Robert Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glibc-2.6 and GCC-4.2 are out, but I'd like to keep Glibc-2.5 and gcc-4.1.x. > Neither of the new packages have added any significant hardening changes, and > they're both going to take 6-12 months to stabilize with other packages. >
As I was working out problems with uClibc-0.9.29, I discovered that gcc-4.2.0 is not only more stable than the gcc-4.1.x series, but also had fewer problems that the gcc-3.4.6. It may not be worth rushing it in at this point, but it is very much worth considering. -- Kevin Day -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
