Are you able to get the {e,f}random devices working with that version?
I've been afraid to change to a later kernel for fear of losing that
feature.
I had not noticed before that the IPRoute2 version number is similar
to the kernel version number. Is there significance to this?
Chris Buxton
Professional Services
Men & Mice
Address: Noatun 17, IS-105, Reykjavik, Iceland
Phone: +354 412 1500
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.menandmice.com
Men & Mice
We bring control and flexibility to network management
This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information only intended for the person or entity to which
it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination,
distribution or copy of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by
reply e-mail and immediately delete this message and all its attachment.
On Feb 3, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Michael Labuschke wrote:
> I'm using 2.6.23.14 with grsec, which is fine. I had the same probs
> you had ( i used the iproute 2.6.23 package.. )
> michael
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ] Im Auftrag von Chris Buxton
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Februar 2008 18:46
> An: Hardened LFS Development List
> Betreff: Re: AW: network problems
>
> I'm using Linux kernel 2.6.19.7. What version should I be using?
>
> Chris Buxton
> Professional Services
> Men & Mice
> Address: Noatun 17, IS-105, Reykjavik, Iceland
> Phone: +354 412 1500
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.menandmice.com
>
> Men & Mice
> We bring control and flexibility to network management
>
> This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential and
> privileged information only intended for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention,
> dissemination, distribution or copy of this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
> us immediately by reply e-mail and immediately delete this message
> and all its attachment.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Labuschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Hardened LFS Development List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2008 8:12:45 AM (GMT-0800) America/
> Los_Angeles
> Subject: AW: network problems
>
> Use a newer kernel.
>
> michael
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Chris
> Buxton
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Februar 2008 09:05
> An: Hardened LFS Development List
> Betreff: Re: network problems
>
> After building another HLFS system based on glibc and linux 2.6,
> again using
> package users, the ip command is once again unable to bring up a link.
>
> # ip link set eth0 up
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> # ip link set lo up
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> # ls /sys/class/net
> eth0 lo
> # ip link show
> 1: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:0c:29:a1:1e:4f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 2: lo: <LOOPBACK> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>
> However, I built and installed the old net-tools package (after
> fixing some
> errors in the source). The ifconfig is able to bring up the
> interfaces:
>
> # ifconfig lo up
> # ifconfig eth0 up
> [ 547.429973] eth0: link up
> # ip link show
> 1: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
> qlen
> 1000
> link/ether 00:0c:29:a1:1e:4f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 2: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>
> Is there some necessary kernel configuration option that I've missed
> to make
> ip work right? If that's not it, what does ifconfig have that ip
> doesn't?
>
> Chris Buxton
> Professional Services
> Men & Mice
> Address: Noatun 17, IS-105, Reykjavik, Iceland
> Phone: +354 412 1500
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.menandmice.com
>
> Men & Mice
> We bring control and flexibility to network management
>
> This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential and
> privileged
> information only intended for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed.
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
> hereby
> notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copy of
> this
> e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
> error,
> please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and immediately delete
> this
> message and all its attachment.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Buxton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Hardened LFS Development List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2008 12:50:05 PM (GMT-0800) America/
> Los_Angeles
> Subject: network problems
>
> Hello,
>
> I've build an HLFS (glibc, kernel 2.6) system, with just the following
> modifications:
>
> - using kernel 2.6.19.7 instead of 2.6.19.2
> - the package user system of package management
>
> I need help figuring out why I can't bring up any network interfaces.
>
> # ip link set eth0 up
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> # ip link set lo up
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> # ls /sys/class/net
> eth0 lo
>
> The build host was the LFS live CD, and the architecture is a VMware
> Workstation 5 machine with the buslogic SCSI adaptor instead of LSI
> Logic, running on an Intel Core Duo.
>
> Chris Buxton
> Professional Services
> Men & Mice
> Address: Noatun 17, IS-105, Reykjavik, Iceland
> Phone: +354 412 1500
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.menandmice.com
>
> Men & Mice
> We bring control and flexibility to network management
>
> This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential and
> privileged information only intended for the person or entity to which
> it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination,
> distribution or copy of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by
> reply e-mail and immediately delete this message and all its
> attachment.
>
>
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
