On Sep 23, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Kristian wrote:
> > http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7478/1.html > http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7484/1.html > http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7489/1.html > http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7492/ > > Just some nice things in Rails 3.0 that might be useful in a hobo > context ;) > Anyone using Hobo with Rails 3.0 out there? How do they currently fit? > I doubt Hobo will work at all with Rails 3.0 - we've hooked much too tightly into ActionPack and friends to withstand the massive refactoring that's taken place. Actually, I think Hobo will likely be a solid proof-of-concept for the "public API" stuff wycats is so crazy about; if we can get Hobo running on Rails 3 without monkey-patching everything to bits, that will show the public API actually works. I floated the idea of a Hobofields-like solution being included in ActiveRecord for 3.0, but it never got much traction on rails-core. It certainly would be nice, as several of the competing ORM setups have a similar (although not as powerful, IMHO) syntax. BTW, the DRYML internals stuff is interesting, but would it make more sense on the wiki? Unless I'm mistaken, anybody can edit the one on Github. Tom, thoughts? --Matt Jones --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
