Apparently no. It throws an error if you try to extend a tag and add polymorphic to it. It also seems problematic to try to alias it and redefine it.
On Sep 24, 6:19 pm, kevinpfromnm <[email protected]> wrote: > Suppose the title says it all. I've got an app where I keep finding > myself having to tweak the field-list for class specific fields. > Since it's not a polymorphic tag and what I'd like is to be able to > use it in a polymorphic way, was wondering if I could do it directly > or even indirectly in a way that wouldn't be too hard on performance. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
