Thanks Kevin for the reply. I'm actually trying to replicate this recipe but inside the input-many: http://cookbook.hobocentral.net/recipes/15-dynamically-populated-select-menus. I assign different ID's for the parts using this other recipe: http://cookbook.hobocentral.net/recipes/8-use-parts-on-repeated-elements but the problem seems to be that the typed_id on new records inside <input-many> are not available. I noticed on the standalone form it produces an extra 'this' (probably because the record doesn't have an ID yet?) : <div class='part-wrapper' id='foo-this:foo'> while inside the <input-many> tag this is produced: <div class='part-wrapper' id='foo-:foo'> which returns the ajax error invalid typed_id: :foo.
On Jun 3, 1:03 pm, kevinpfromnm <[email protected]> wrote: > you can't nest forms within forms, that's why it's a field-list. > getting part to work on an input-many is going to be tough as each > piece is created by javascript really and doesn't have a guaranteed > model associated with it. > > I'm not sure why you'd want a form to be a part though since the user > will be modifying the pieces themselves and then saving... > > On Jun 3, 9:13 am, sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am trying to have a part on a <do> inside a <myfield-view:> tag > > which is in turn inside an <input-many>, however I get the error > > "invalid typed_id: :myfield from the parent's controller (the class > > that has_many). Any ideas how to resolve this? It works right on a > > standalone form but not inside input-many. I'm wondering if using the > > standalone child form inside the <input-many> instead of the field- > > list would solve this problem, is there a way to do that? > > > thank you > > > sam > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
