I agree. Was thinking the same thing. We have always wanted to create multiple styles (Themes) but haven't had the cycles...
Owen On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Donald R. Ziesig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/10/2011 9:11 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: > >> On Feb 10, 2011, at 13:09 , Owen wrote: >> >>> Yes, this limit is way too "Magic". Should we never limit this? >>> >> Does anyone ever ship real sites with the default look? I would assume >> not. Not that it's wrong, but one usually wants to customise the looks. If >> so I'd think that moving to a limitless option would help. A vertical >> navigation on the side would probably be the easiest option. >> >> Believe it or not, I have a client that loves the default look (the same > one where the magic tab limit started this thread). The only difference in > the deployed site will be having the client's company logo in the header. > > I have a separate main-nav.dryml file for the dynamics of the tabs (not all > tabs are visible simultaneously) and multiple lines of tabs. There is a > slight issue that I have not yet investigated. If the active tab is on a > row above the bottom, subsequent rows are indented to the right of the > active tab, causing the number of rows to increase, sometimes drastically. > > Don Z. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hobo Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en. > > -- - Owen Owen Dall, Chief Systems Architect Barquin International www.barquin.com Cell: 410-991-0811 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en.
