On 28/08/12 13:29, Bill Richter wrote:
>> Yes, Mizar is certainly shackled in the way Michael described.

> I can't figure out your position.  I agree there might be some value in
> shackling for retrieval from huge libraries.  Why don't we concentrate on
> education.  I contend that shackling the students' proof assistant is bad
> design.  Michael did not say this, but I say it after listening to Michael,
> and I'm glad that miz3 is not shackling the students (me, right now).

We can imagine two sorts of student here.  One is the person who is 
mathematically sophisticated but a novice as far as theorem-proving is 
concerned.  This person (i.e., Bill) manifestly doesn't want a "shackled" 
backend prover.

However, if the student has little sophistication when it comes to writing 
proofs, I think there are two advantages in having a shackled prover:

1. the student doesn't waste time waiting for the prover to give up on 
unrealistic or unprovable goals.  Fast feedback is universally recognised as a 
good thing when using a system: having it come back fast and say "No. Make your 
proof better" has to be a good thing for learning how to make better proofs.

2. if the student does occasionally get the backend prover to fluke a hard 
result, they miss out on the pedagogically valuable exercise of actually 
proving 
that result.  Do you really want a student to be able to come back to you with 
that theorem due to Los, and say "Oh, I proved it by waiting for meson to 
finish."  Bill thought that proving it by hand was interesting and valuable, 
and 
discussed Rob Arthan's proof at length.  Surely the value that Bill derived 
from 
that exercise would be just as great for students.

Michael



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
hol-info mailing list
hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info

Reply via email to