On Sep 21, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > I guess Mark is asking for the working group to adopt the architecture > document.
No, not yet, but I hope very soon. > The document has been posted by Tim today, I believe. Obviously people have > to take a look before they can decide. > > In any case, the file name or formal adoption is not as important as talking > about the contents. Absolutely. > I'm one of the authors of the new document and would like to provide some > background on what we put into the document. First off, the document is a > further development of the one that Mark and I wrote earlier in the summer. > When he and started out to write that document, our ambition was to "just > specify what the architecture is" :-) But as usual, when we worked more on it > and with all the discussions in Quebec and on the list, we realized how hard > the subject is. > > The intent of the new document is to talk about specific topics within the > architecture (such as subnet size) and present the various factors that > affect the topic, rather than provide a ready-made recommendation (such as > using largest possible subnets). We thought that this would be useful input > in preparation for our meeting, and perhaps in the meeting we can make some > progress in actually selecting the direction. For now, the most important > feedback on the document would be if we have covered the important topics and > correctly explained the factors affecting them. I'm sure we have missed > plenty, so please send contributions! Don't be shy now! - Mark _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
