On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:42, Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If homenet is going to support arbitrary self-configuring topologies, >> and pervasive legacy IPv4 is required, we'd surely end up recommending >> NAT444-within-the-home as the only remotely practicable approach. > > Hans from D-Link suggests that another option is simply to bridge IPv4 > packets and route IPv6 packets.
To be very honest, if you have two D-Link router at home, you put one after another, it won't work today. I believe the problem is quite general a case to many NAT boxes today since they all share 192.168.0.0/24 or 192.168.1.0/24. So what I told Lorenzo is that, in that case I would like to disable NAT and route IPv6. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
