> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Bellis [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 8:41 AM
> To: Howard, Lee
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for 
> draft-howard-homenet-routing-
> comparison-00.txt
>
>
> On 29 Dec 2011, at 22:33, Howard, Lee wrote:
>
> > I got tired of waiting for someone else to drive consensus on a routing 
> > solution
>
> If there is consensus, it's for zOSPF, if only because no-one else appears to 
> believe strongly
> enough in their preferred solution to write a draft about it.

I don't think there's consensus on zOSPF.  I think there are a few strong 
advocates and a lot of pointed silence I did present an alternative (based on a 
draft), which had an equal mix of "interesting" and "bleah."

The problem with zOSPF is that it doesn't meet our requirements.  It doesn't 
detect borders (unless the border happens to have another zOSPF router with the 
wrong password), it requires configuration (for the password), it doesn't 
handle walled gardens (a requirement being debated), it's not lightweight.

I'm trying to be fair, and not just protect the PIO proposal because I proposed 
it.  It needs work.  Its biggest lack is the need for hierarchical addressing, 
but I think draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment solves that.  I don't want to 
see zOSPF adopted just because its advocates were louder.

> I think Mark and I will need to make that call quite soon, but probably not 
> until the authors
> of the architecture draft have incorporated the routing requirements and 
> other comments
> since Taipei and put those into -01.

My perception is that we have three people in favor of zOSPF, three supporting 
a PIO, seven each supporting a different alternative, and 30 silent.

Lee


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to 
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the 
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and 
any printout.
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to