In message <50698d7f.5000...@gmail.com> Brian E Carpenter writes: > On 01/10/2012 08:32, Damien Saucez wrote: > > Curtis, > > > > Thank you for the comments. > > > > Our target in this document is to raise the question of multihoming > > in personal and/or small/medium enterprise networks, so for now > > we were not looking at the mobile device such as smartphones > > connected to both 4g and wifi (for this, the multihoming solution > > must be implemented directly on the device). We believe that > > SOHO would be interested being multihomed but can't afford the > > cost of operating multihoming themselves. > > That's a good description of why the IETF designed SHIM6, which requires > no cooperation from any router or ISP and scales well, should cost little > or nothing, and will work for mobile devices too, on two conditions > > 1. It becomes widely deployed > 2. Firewalls allow the SHIM6 extension header. > > I don't believe that this is really a topic for homenet, however. > > Brian
Brian, Your item #2 might be worth recording somewhere as a requirement if it is not already in rfc6204bis. (I didn't look). If shim6 is the recommendation on the part of homenet as to how to deal with multihoming in the home, then this is significant and should be in the framework. Curtis _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
