>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew McGregor <andrewm...@gmail.com> writes:
    Andrew> This whole thread is making me think that specifying that we
    Andrew> use either babel (with attention to getting it documented
    Andrew> properly) or one of the OSPFv4 MANET extensions, in the case
    Andrew> where we have only a /64 and perhaps any time we find we
    Andrew> have an 802.11s, ad-hoc or NBMA interface in play.  That way
    Andrew> we introduce /128 routes, and everything continues to work.

so, great maybe, except that now either:
1) hosts have to participate in the routing protocol. (so impact on
   hosts)

2) we have to deploy proxy-ND.

(and that's why RPL isn't on the table at homenet)

-- 
Michael Richardson
-on the road-


Attachment: pgpldkdCvNgVD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to