On 02/26/2013 07:50 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 26/02/2013 06:39, Fernando Gont wrote: > ... >> I've been lurking for the most time, so.. double-checking: essentially, >> what you want is that you always keep DNS for nodes in the internal >> network, and those entries remain up-to-date e.g. in the presence of >> renumbering? (I guess dynamic updates by each client is not acceptable, > > Why not?
Because if it's acceptable, there's no problem to worry about? :-) -- I guess the thing with dynamic updates is that it doesn't work with "zero configuration" (unless one assumes that updates on a local network could be allowed to be unauthenticated?) Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
