Op 4 mrt. 2013, om 09:51 heeft Ole Troan <o...@cisco.com> het volgende geschreven:
> Teco, > >> Reading the homenet-arch, I can't find how multi-addressed hosts are guided >> to prefer one address over another. I think such facility is beneficial in >> multi-homed homenets. > > the intention is to propagate the SAS/DAS policy given with > draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt, > and more specific routes learn on the border, combined with source address > dependent forwarding. > as well as rule 5.5 of 6724. This will work when every access router is a DHCP server, right? What if no DHCP or DHCP-relay? Do we generate this option out of routing information? Or some other zero-config magic? > > that's in solution space though. there is already a reference to the > multihoming-without-ipv6nat document. > > do you have ideas of anything else we should add to the architecture document? Maybe it is my reservations on the current suggested solutions. I don't understand why we don't make use of ND. Then, access routers can provide whatever they wish, from whatever source and the host can ignore or take some benefits. Teco > > cheers, > Ole _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
