>> There is no real reasons for ISP's to only do /64s except spite the >> customer. The difference in costs from the RIRs for the bigger >> address space is chump change even for developing states. All their >> equipment will support > /64 because the big players want to support >> that. >> > Actually, that's not quite right. A number of ISPs are only offering /64s > because a significant number of IPv6-supporting home routers can't handle > shorter prefixes (although it's getting better) - we've seen this in our > lab. ISPs I've spoken with plan to offer shorter prefixes as home routers > can support them.
right. changing the homenet architecture because of buggy software seems like putting the cart in front of the horse. I heard about this bug years ago, wasn't aware it still existed in current gear. does it? Ole _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
