On Feb 7, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 08/02/2014 00:20, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: >> >>>> Absolutely, but it means resetting DSCP, thus breaking QoS in other >>>> parts >>>> of the packet path. >>> >>> Well to be more precise, it means making sure DSCP is a value that the >>> customer is allowed to use (or rewriting it). Just like you have to make >>> sure that the packet's source address is a value that the customer is >>> allowed to use (or dropping the packet). No? >> >> Correct. > > Yes. There's nothing we've discussed in this thread that is different > from the diffserv architecture (RFC 2475). Diffserv works within > a single administrative domain (possibly split up using tunnels). > There are some efforts towards inter-provider diffserv in TSVWG > (RFC 4594, RFC 5127, draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon).
Great, happy to see everyone finally at some level of violent agreement then! - Mark > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
