Ray Hunter <v6...@globis.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:08:53AM +0000, Ralf Weber wrote:
>>
>>> or on the ISP auth name server). I have no problem with signing on
>>> the CPE. I just don't want to make it mandatory
>>
>> For the purposes of this discussion, I'm going to assume that one has
>> an inward-facing zone and and outward-facing one (i.e. this is a
>> split-brain DNS situation).
> I think even large corporations are slowly learning that split-brain
> DNS is a bad idea that seemed like a good idea at the time, especially
> in the presence of highly-mobile devices, and forwarders.
> I'm becoming a convert myself to that way of thinking. That doesn't
> mean to say that we can't use 'views' or some other mechanism to hide
> some records from being resolvable from the outside.
The issue is that actually, you want some nodes to be able to resolve many
records even when they are "outside".
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting for hire =-
pgp5taAPzqbtD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
