> At IETF 89 in London we took three hums: > > 1. On use of OSPF vs HNCP for configuration - strong consensus for HNCP > > 2. On how many routing protocols we should support in Homenet - > strong consensus that it should be zero or one, but no consensus yet > on which. > > 3. On adoption of HNCP as a WG item - good consensus for, a few undecided, > none against. > > On this basis the Chairs wish to proceed with the formal call for adoption of > draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00, with a two week response window. >
I'm in favour of adopting this document, with the premise that HNCP is not going to be yet another routing protocol. that is restricted to bootstrapping / configuring the home network. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
