On Oct 15, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: > See, I don't find that ideal at all. If I'm swinging around on my backyard > trapeze watching > the flying wallendas instructional video from my home jukebox, I really don't > want to have > my network break connectivity because I happened to switch to my neighbor's > wifi and I > was using a ULA when I could have kept connectivity with a GUA.
This is simply a non-sequitur. It has nothing to do with homenet. It has to do with how the stack works on your home, and what the propagation of radio waves looks like in your back yard. The assumption that you will be able to access your jukebox over your neighbor's wifi contains packed in it so much new protocol work we could fork several working groups to handle it. > As far as homenet goes, i'd rather it not bake in any assumptions about ULA's > beyond what > is already there. I hear you. But why should the working group care what you prefer? I don't say that to be dismissive, but to encourage you to give a reason that isn't just an opinion. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
