On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:39 AM, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7...@att.com> wrote: > I think support for receiving more specific routes in RA messages (RFC 4191) > would be easier to get hosts to implement than DHCPv6.
This wouldn't help, because there's nothing to differentiate the GUA from the ULA. > In any case, I think there needs to be a solution that *always* works in > homenet hosts. As I mentioned earlier, the downside to not doing this is that if a site gets flash-renumbered, connections on the local network that might not have broken if a ULA were used will break. This is a fairly mild problem. Additionally, we talked about advertising ULAs in DNS on the local network, and GUAs externally, so even devices that don't do DHCPv6 would benefit from this. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
