Hi, Benoit and all, Reply in lines.
On 29/10/2014 09:13, Benoit Claise wrote: >Dear all, > >[sorry for double-posting, but we need the specific feedback from the >HOMENET community] > >1. scope >I finished reading the ANIMA mailing list and, based on the feedback, >Joel, Ted, and I would like to clarify the ANIMA scope for "the set of >specific reusable infrastructure components that support autonomic >interactions between devices" (quoting the charter) > >The charter currently mentions: > The ANIMA working group will initially focus on enterprise, ISP >networks and IoT. > >Multiple tracks were discussed on the mailing list. > * keep enterprise, ISP networks and IoT > * focus on enterprise and ISP networks > * everything, but the initial focus is enterprise and carrier? > * professionally-managed networks > >It seems to us that "professionally-managed networks" is what ANIMA is >after. And it's potentially a distraction to try to segment the scope >based on enterprise, ISP, homenet, or IoT. What is IoT after all? > >OLD: The ANIMA working group will initially focus on enterprise, ISP >networks and IoT. >NEW: The ANIMA working group focuses on professionally-managed >networks. > >Does it sound about right? Yes, it is right. After we develop a generic protocol/mechanism, it is possible that other people may reuse them in other scenarios. It is out of our current focus, for sure. >2. Overlap with HOMENET >This distinction in point 1 might help regarding the potential overlap >of the solution for distributed IPv6 prefix management. >Btw, the new charter has been adapted: >OLD: A solution for distributed IPv6 prefix management within a network. >NEW: the solution for distributed IPv6 prefix management within a >large-scale network That's exactly stated in the individual draft that submitted to anima. >Also, The HOMENET collaboration has been stressed in the charter. It would be helpful. >3. Others >I believe I took care of the others changes proposed on the mailing. If >this is not the case, let me know. >At this point in time, please provide concrete change to the charter >text if some issues persist. >Charter v15 has just been posted, and you can review the detailed >changes at >https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fd >oc%2Fcharter-ietf-anima%2Fwithmilestones-00-14.txt&difftype=--html&sub >mit=Go!&url2=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-a >nima%2Fwithmilestones-00-15.txt > > >4. Security Advisor. >I have requested one for ANIMA to the security ADs. It would be great. Many thanks. Best regards, Sheng >Regards, Benoit > >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >homenet@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
