> Op 17 nov. 2014, om 17:53 heeft Margaret Wasserman <margaret...@gmail.com> 
> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> On Nov 16, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Teco Boot <t...@inf-net.nl> wrote:
>> It could be long enough to get in trouble. There could be more than two 
>> neighbors, loaded wireless links and jitter (for collision avoidance) or 
>> loss for routing packets.
> 
> Why would a stub network router be any different, for this, than any other 
> router?  Are we likely to run into these problems whenever a router that is 
> connected to more than one peer goes away?

The link state protocols may have loops during convergence. Babel has not. I 
had babel in mind here.

If we include 1. low probability on routing loops and 2. optimized for wireless 
links, including wireless mesh on the RP requirement list, I am fine.

Teco



> Margaret
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to