Thanks, Barbara. Lets hope UPnP/DLNA are starting to consider to cooperate with IETF on service discovery.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:37:38PM +0000, STARK, BARBARA H wrote: > > There are good proposal how to do servicce discovery in homenets or the > > like with DNS-SD (/mDNS), but i think we should still worry about > > compatibility with UPnP. Both of these requirements (UPnP and DNS-SD) are > > IMHO better solved with router-level "proxy" > > solutions than with ASM IP multicast. > > FYI. I did a presentation to DLNA (which has a lot of key UPnP people) that > warned them to start thinking about service discovery in the multi-router > world, and the world where more and more Wi-Fi APs are limiting the multicast > that makes it to Wi-Fi devices. I mentioned the DNS-SD proxy work, homenet, > and told them: > " - People have started to study the current quantity of multicast traffic > and its impact on power consumption by battery-operated Wi-Fi devices. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-desmouceaux-ipv6-mcast-wifi-power-usage-00 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vyncke-6man-mcast-not-efficient-00 > - Concern is growing and proposals are starting to appear for ways to > decrease the quantity of multicast messages. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yourtchenko-colitti-nd-reduce-multicast-00 " > > My recommendations were that they had 2 basic options of either also > supporting DNS-SD / mDNS for service discovery, or defining a SSDP proxy > similar to what I expect will be done for DNS-SD. Anyway, I told them I'd > keep them updated on the state of affairs regarding this issue. > Barbara -- --- Toerless Eckert, eck...@cisco.com _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
