> Op 25 feb. 2015, om 22:00 heeft Mark Townsley <m...@townsley.net> het > volgende geschreven: > > > > > >> On Feb 25, 2015, at 9:50 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> >> wrote: >> >> >> Ray Hunter <v6...@globis.net> wrote: >>> I agree that WiFi roaming is a problem that needs addressing in >>> Homenet. >> >> Yes, but can we rule it out of scope for now? > > Yes, we can. > > I think the WG needs to focus on securing success before taking on wild > success at this moment in time.
When performance in dual stack networks with multiple WiFi AP's in homes suffers from homenet protocols, this WG produces dead protocols. I am more hopeful. I hope we can enable 802.11 fast handover by distributing the required info. Still open question how to route or bridge over the wired backbone. Teco > > - Mark > >> >> Can we agree that it's not strictly a routing problem, and that the set of >> solutions that we are considering could be used, and that we could also >> explain how to do something like automatically setup capwap using HNCP for >> discovery, but that we don't have the head-of-queue block on this item for >> now? >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works >> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> homenet mailing list >> homenet@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
