Thanks for the review.

We just submitted https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-05
and hope this versions addresses the remaining issues.


Cheers,

Steven

On 02.06.2015 12:04, Mark Townsley wrote:
> 
> Authors,
> 
> We have reviewed your changes (just the diffs). Thank you for your
> efforts and the quick response to WGLC comments. We found a few nits of
> our own, would you mind including these in a quick -05 update? We will
> then hand this off to the ADs their review, IETF last call, and IESG review.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Mark and Ray
> 
> Terminology section - please delineate the terms from the definition. e.g., 
> 
> DNCP Profile: is a definition...
> 
> We found the use of ()'s confusing. e.g., Effective (trust) verdict..
> are the ()'s necessary?
> 
> "Something with data about most recent request(s) for network state -
> simplest one being a timestamp for the most recent request for network
> state (see Section 5.2)."
> 
> What is this something? This seems ambiguously worded.
> 
> Section 4, and perhaps elsewhere in the doc now, suffers from a lack of
> delineation between the term being defined and the definition. What you
> had before was better in our view (with the articles, "A", "An",
> "The"...), but we are fine with you removing them if you make the terms
> stand out separately. 
> 
> Rather than "Zeroed", can we say something like "Padding (of value zero)
> ... "
> 
> Also, rather than "These padding bytes MUST NOT beincluded in the length
> field." .. Of course you mean that the padding bytes must not
> contributed to the length field, or included in the calculation of the
> length field. But, that's not what the sentence actually says. 
> 
> Just above section 7.2, the pipe symbol used in the ascii art is in the
> wrong spot (16.5 rather than 16).
> 
> Also, spurious "with" just before 7.2: 
> 
> "for the node with matching node"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
> 

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to