> It is very hard to find a wording for this that everyone agrees with. Yes.
> For now it was changed to “DNCP is an abstract protocol, that must be > combined with a specific profile to make a complete implementable > protocol.” I'm not sure that I know what an "abstract protocol" is. I would suggest something like the following: This document (DNCP) defines a distributed algorithm that can be used by protocols that need to flood static or slowly changing information in a timely manner across an IP network, as well as a suggested packet format to be used by such protocols. I'd also eliminate the vague term "DNCP profile", and replace it by "protocol using DNCP". -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
