No one is saying that 802.11 can't do multicast. It does do multicast, but with 
more loss than the protocols sending multicast may assume or be able to 
accommodate. As I understand the presentation that kicked off this discussion, 
this becomes an issue since IPv6 relies more on multicast.  While IP came 
first, IPv6 didn't.  

Increasing use of low power devices that have times when they "sleep" and 
therefore miss multicasts contributes to the problem. But low power use for 
battery or low-energy source based devices is essential. It isn't going away. 
(Wired devices sleep to save energy too but they are generally less power 
constrained so they are able to go into a less deep sleep and can wake to 
receive traffic.)  And even when wireless devices don't sleep, they experience 
varying connectivity due to movement.

Pointing fingers isn't going to help this. We need to get together and see what 
can be done to improve the situation. 

Regards,
Pat

-----Original Message-----
From: ieee-ietf-coord [mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:22 PM
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Cc: Toerless Eckert (eckert); Alia Atlas; Dan Romascanu (droma...@avaya.com); 
Glenn Parsons; Homenet; ieee-ietf-co...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee); Eric Gray
Subject: Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] [homenet] Despair

On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:

> It is simply unfair from the IETF to use Wi-Fi as if it was Ethernet and 
> then complain to IEEE that in fact it is not.

This is an interesting viewpoint. IETF isn't "using wifi as if it was 
Ethernet". The customers who buy Wifi products buy it and run IP over it, 
expecting it should work (because that's what the advertising says). IP 
has been designed for wired ethernet (and Wifi carries ethernet frames). 
As far as I can tell, 802.11 never told the IETF that it wouldn't support 
multicast (really).

I'd say IETF isn't saying "IP works great over Wifi" (it doesn't really 
make any claims for any L1 or L2). However, I see producers of Wifi 
equipment saying that their products are great for using to connect to the 
Internet, which is saying "Wifi is great for IP".

> IPv6 over Ethernet makes heavy use of multicast over Ethernet, which for 
> the lack of a highly scalable Multicast service always ends up 
> broadcasted over the whole fabric.
>
> When Wi-Fi is confused with Ethernet and the whole multi link becomes a 
> single layer 2 fabric, we create a crisis that will not be solved by 
> imputing the responsibility on the other SDO.

Which is exactly why I said that both SDOs need to do something. However, 
since IP was "first" I think that 802.11 should have come to IETF a long 
time ago and said that it couldn't do multicast. Basically, what I 
interpret you're saying is that Wifi in its current form isn't suited to 
carry IP the way IP has been designed, for a long time. That would be news 
for a lot of people.

> My suggestion is to finally recognize that Wi-Fi is not Ethernet, in 
> particular from the perspective of multicast, and provide the 
> appropriate L3 mechanisms for IPv6 over Wi-Fi, for which the backbone 
> router discussed above is one candidate solution.

It's not only IPv6, but it's also IPv4 (since it uses broadcast, but less 
of it).

But what I hear here is that your opinion is that 802.11 doesn't need to 
change, but the IETF needs to change for IP to work over Wifi. I'd really 
appreciate some kind of official agreement from each SDOs who should do 
what. If the long-term technical solution is that the IETF should change 
L3 to basically avoid broadcast and multicast, then that's fine, as long 
as this is agreed upon by both parties.

However, I do think that 802.11 needs to point out to its members that if 
they don't implement assured multicast replication, IP doesn't work 
properly. Then they can decide what should be done in the short term, 
because changing IP will take quite a while.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swm...@swm.pp.se

_______________________________________________
ieee-ietf-coord mailing list
ieee-ietf-co...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to