Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
>> 1) if the v4 prefix on the link is renumbered because a different router
>> won the election, then the existing router may still have connectivity,
>> and may still be willing to route packets.
> The old prefix is no longer announced over the routing protocol, so the
> old addresses are unreachable now. (Or are you suggesting that we
That's not entirely true. Nodes on the same link (such as 99% of current
home setups) don't need the routing protocol to reach things.
My point here is not to break how IPv4 works in a typical setup.
(You may argue the word "works" above...)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
