Martin Stiemerling has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-11: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-dncp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am abstaining, as this draft is not specifying a full protocol but just giving an abstract protocol (i.e., a hull only). I would ballot with no-objection if the designated status of this draft would be 'Informational', but given that it is 'Proposed Standard' I do not see that RFC 2026, Section 3.1 and 3.2 are covered. It is neither a Technical Specification nor an Applicability Statement. However, I will not stand in the way of the publication of the document. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
