> Op 27 okt. 2015, om 12:18 heeft Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com> het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hear, hear!
> 
> We have spent far too much time arguing about this, and I am happy we have a 
> conclusion. A big thank you to the chairs for calling making this call. I 
> strongly agree that given the dynamics of the home networking market, there 
> needs to be one, and only one, routing protocol. I don't see anything else 
> working in the real world.
> 
> Personally, I happen to think that babel is the best choice, not so much 
> because of the protocol itself but because of the current availability of 
> solid, freely-licensed, small-footprint implementations. But IS-IS would have 
> been fine as well; so would OSPF, if there had been an implementation, and 
> even HNCP fallback would have fine. At the end of the day it doesn't really 
> matter which one we choose, as long as we choose one.
> 
> Let's hope that this will stop the arguments and we can all get on with 
> implementation and deployment.

Well said, +1 to all of the above

Cheers,
Sander

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to