-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/3/15 6:45 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote: >> However, a number of ISPs (including the IETF, it seems) do not >> allow prefix delegation. > > No, that's not correct. The IETF NOC team wasn't willing to adjust > their setup for this event. That doesn't mean that they won't fix > things for a future meeting.
we have discussed doing it before, it's mostly a question of having the right pieces in place and tested before hand. we have enough moving parts this time with new routers that it's maybe not the best place to be doing that also. this network with respect to model/deployment looks more like an interprise or campus build and less like an ISP, it also has to contend with (in the case of the hotel net extensions) running on top of third party gear which it doesn't control. >> Do we ignore the problem > > It's not a problem. shouldn't be. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlY6k44ACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrI3wACcDpOLYTZa4OXHiE+GPOjz9/BJ 9gAAnjStwVvWsqD8QIGNpf+IeuFc1Imw =/3Hs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
