Hi Steven,
Your response look good except for...
On 11/20/15 4:07 AM, Steven Barth wrote:
>
>> * The definition of Leaf in 5.1 is unclear. It says "Such an interface
>> uses the Internal category with the exception that HNCP traffic MUST NOT
>> be sent on the interface, and all such traffic received on the interface
>> MUST be ignored." The "all such traffic" is ambiguous. Based on the
>> definition of the Guest category, I think "all such traffic" is really
>> "all HNCP traffic".
>
> I have changed it to
>
> Such an interface uses the Internal category with the exception that
> it MUST NOT operate as a DNCP endpoint.
>
> to be in line with the changed definitions for the internal and external
> categories (to address one of Ben's comments).
> Two things on this. First, is a Leaf interface on the router facing devices that don't support HNCP or on the hosts facing an HNCP router? I would think you would want this to be a category on the router. Second, I don't quite understand "DNCP endpoint". There is no definition of that in either this spec or the DNCP spec. So, I am not sure what that would entail for an implementer. Regards, Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
