On Jul 31, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > The things that Ted wants, such "this the ID of the router", and the like, > and this really the topic of the ANIMA BRSKI protocol. It can be profiled > to work in Homenet, provided that HNCP can elect a registrar. > I think that is entirely workable, btw. > I don't think that Homenet has to invent any protocols here. > > Is there a document for this Ted? I will offer to help.
Your help would be much appreciated, but I don't know why there would be an election, so there's at a minimum some thinking to do there. There is no document yet. Also, bear in mind that a vendor-centric approach to this probably isn't going to work, because right now all the Homenet work I'm aware of is happening on OpenWRT and LEDE. I'm sure that will change if we come up with something vendors want to deploy, but it has to work for the prototype case too. And there's no particular reason to think that a PKI key from a vendor makes a device trustworthy.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
