Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> writes: > El 16 ag 2017, a les 9:40, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> va escriure: >> Ah, if this is your concern, I think that's answered by the whitelisting >> stuff I was talking about earlier. But in this case you really do need to >> have separate caches per PvD, and the MPvD-aware clients on the net need to >> be able to use them. We could say that this is optional to support, >> though, and so if you want to pay for one router with this feature, that >> router's resolver can be advertised in the PvD-aware path. > > BTW, I think we have probably carried this discussion as far as is > useful until a new rev of the draft is done. Daniel is working on a > new draft, he said, and when he's done his bit I'll do a pass as well > and try to capture the changes we've discussed here, and then we can > iterate again. :)
Yup, fine with me :) -Toke _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
