El Aug 28, 2017, a les 6:07 PM, Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com> va escriure: > Section 4 contains a list that it describes as defining "the behavior of [DNS] > systems". Item number 7 seems to be something else: I don't know what code or > configuration would result from this statement. Maybe move this item to > section > 3?
This is the format that RFC 6761 requires us to follow, which is why it's being done this way. I think the text makes sense if you read it with the RFC 6761 list of criteria in section 5 in mind. So I don't think it makes sense to move it, although I agree it scans a bit strangely. :) > With the explanation in section 6: > > it may be useful for the resolver to identify different > homenets on which it has resolved names > > Doesn't this mitigation in the security section require name resolution > libraries to recognize names that end in ".home.arpa." as special so that it > can treat them differently? Section 6 is talking about future work. If we come up with a way to do this, then it would update this document, changing the normative requirement.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
